Wednesday 4 May 2016

The Haavara Agreement & The Balfour Declaration

As the "antisemitism"  row continues within the UK Labour party, it is somewhat ironic to see those who were once described as "anti-racists" working within Labour backed organisations such as Hope not Hate and Unite Against Fascism, to now be accused of practicing what they've preached about for years. Ken Livingstone, former London mayor for Labour and honourary president of the UAF,  has recently got himself into trouble for making the bizarre claim that "Hitler was a zionist".

It seems inconceivable with all that we've learned about Hitler and his regime that he would support Zionism, which is a philosophy which very much supports a form of world-wide political domination by Jews. In fact it is inconceivable. Any theory which supports the idea that Hitler was somehow working for Jews is nonsense, however there is a very small nugget of truth hidden somewhere in the mix that perhaps the Israeli supporter would not be entirely comfortable with. The mass-media of this country however seems to be pouring so much time into character assassinating those dubbed antisemitic, that they seem to be ignoring any facts they're stating. Perhaps they do this out of fear that the lesser-known information against Israel becomes mainstream.

Whilst we should perhaps refrain from feeling sorry for those who have done much to stifle free-speech through the actions of 'anti-racism' organisations over the years, we should at least come forward and say where and when they're correct.



NSDAP & The Havaara Agreement

So impressed were the NSDAP with how well theagreement was going, a special commemorative
coin was minted in Germany to celebrate the
partnership between them and Zionists in Palestine.
The average person who possesses no further knowledge on how the persecution of Jews began in Germany, would be forgiven for thinking that it began randomly with the boycott of Jewish goods  on the 1st of April, 1933. What is rarely cited is that the German's boycott was in fact a retaliation to a Jewish led boycott that began a month earlier. 

With the German economy still in much disarray after two decades of severe economic sanctions as a result of the treaty of Versailles, the German administration was concerned about the implications of wider economic sanctions and the damage that they could do to Germany's recovery. If anything, the animosity towards Jews was acerbated by a large group of international Zionists who desired to see Germany's economy fall flat. 

A desire to rid Germany of Jews altogether led to an unlikely agreement between the NSDAP and a small group of Zionist interests however (there were different camps within the Zionist movement, and they did not always agree with one another.) The Haavara Agreement, was a resettlement programme whereby German Jews were willingly repatriated to Palestine. This system was funded by those who emigrated, their wealth in Germany was liquidated by the German state, and partly returned to them on the understanding that they brought German goods to export to Palestine once they arrived in their new homeland. This agreement helped German economy in that it kept some profit coming in for German exporters, and some in the Zionist lobby were pleased that the flow of Jewish immigrants back to Palestine could one day populate a homogeneous Jewish state in Israel, which eventually it obviously did.


The agreement ceased with the outbreak of war in 1939 however.

Whilst some might see a connection between the aggressive nature of Israel's border expansion and war-time Germany, the 60,000 Jews who relocated to Palestine were of little consequence in the creation of the state of Israel. 



The Balfour Agreement


A newspaper clipping at the time.
Israel had been an agreed goal of the British in the Balfour Agreement during WWI in 1917. With the French and British losing WWI and Germany being kind enough to offer the Allies terms in 1916, it seems the only way to keep Britain in the war was by keeping certain international financiers sweet who were predominately Jewish, some of whom happened to be incredibly pro-Zionist. The Balfour Agreement was a letter of intent from the British Government to a member of the Rothschild family in the UK, explaining how the British would honour a deal for the creation of an Israeli state.

Considering the incredible amount of money that the British were borrowing from America at that time, it is perhaps conceivable to suspect a conspiracy was occurring during such a tumultuous time. The American economy, through the recently created Federal Reserve in 1913, was very much under Zionist authority with an alliance of the Rockerfeller, Morgan, Warburg and Rothschild dynasties sitting on it's committee. Given that it was America that Britain looked to for it's funding requirements, the decision to offer Israel to the Zionists was more than likely part of a deal, rather than a separate issue, given that at that time, much of Levant was in total chaos.


Whilst any rational human will think the concept of deliberately keeping WWI going was insanity, the truth is that it was massively profitable for many types of industry, and hence politicians can be bribed by said interests into artificially fighting a pointless war. Even more insane is the fact the same banking dynasties that were funding the allies, were also funding the German war machine too.

When WWI ended, the treaty of Versailles was brought in against Germany. This effectively wringed their economy and made most of their revenue payable to the various financiers that had been funding both sides under the monumental amount of reparations it was forced to pay. Germany was also humiliated into accepting sole responsibility for WWI, which simply wasn't true, and by the fact that much of it's territory had been annexed by the newly formed state of Czechoslovakia, with other territories given over to Poland and France. It is often said that the harshness of the treaty of Versailles was what led to the election of the hardline NSDAP. Hitler and many others, blamed the predominately Jewish financiers for their hand in humiliating the German people.

Despite the British giving word to the Zionist world that they would be supporting the formation of Israel, they clearly saw what an issue they would have facilitating this change in an area that was already inhabited by Arabs. With the help of the United Nations, the British tried to partition Palestine as fairly as possible, however Zionist terrorists waged a campaign of bombings and murders, essentially because they wanted the Arabs out, and wanted to claim the entire country for themselves.



Looking at Israel today in 2016, it's clear that the same ruthlessness exists as they unironically declare all Palestinians terrorists, whilst ignoring it's own terrorist past, or indeed the actions of it's well-financed and well-armed military. 

Conclusion

No, Hitler was not a Zionist. Far from it. Considering Hitler confiscated Jewish wealth, including that of the Rothschild dynasty, you would be hard-pressed to claim otherwise. The modest contribution to Jewish settlers that the Haavara Agreement made, would not have in anyway contributed to the troubles that eventually engulfed Palestine. Perhaps ironically, the decision to create Israel had already been made back during the previous World War, as part of a deal which eventually led to the German nation being humiliated and ready for war again twenty years later.
Had Britain been willing to accept peace talks with Germany in 1916 instead of dealing with the Zionist Rothschilds in America, the outcome of European, Jewish and indeed world history today might be very different today.



No comments:

Post a Comment